<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 676 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. It emphasized the necessity of supporting evidence for additions based on survey statements and upheld the &#039;Percentage of Completion Method&#039; for income recognition in real estate deals. The Tribunal highlighted that unsupported statements and unsubstantiated additions are inadequate for tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 676 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. It emphasized the necessity of supporting evidence for additions based on survey statements and upheld the &#039;Percentage of Completion Method&#039; for income recognition in real estate deals. The Tribunal highlighted that unsupported statements and unsubstantiated additions are inadequate for tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>