<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 667 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403075</link>
    <description>Fresh advances to a shareholder were examined under deemed dividend rules in section 2(22)(e), but the amount remained excluded where it was later adjusted against dividend and therefore fell within the set-off exclusion in section 2(22)(iii). The assessee did not dispute the shareholding threshold or the basic applicability of section 2(22)(e); the controversy was confined to the fresh advance during the year. As the amount of Rs. 3,07,230 was treated as covered by the statutory exclusion, it was not includible as deemed dividend and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:12:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 667 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403075</link>
      <description>Fresh advances to a shareholder were examined under deemed dividend rules in section 2(22)(e), but the amount remained excluded where it was later adjusted against dividend and therefore fell within the set-off exclusion in section 2(22)(iii). The assessee did not dispute the shareholding threshold or the basic applicability of section 2(22)(e); the controversy was confined to the fresh advance during the year. As the amount of Rs. 3,07,230 was treated as covered by the statutory exclusion, it was not includible as deemed dividend and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>