https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293016 The HC determined BIAL is a "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution, subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The court found BIAL's tender process arbitrary, lacking transparency, and influenced by favoritism. Consequently, the court quashed the shortlisting and contract award, directing BIAL to restart the tender process within 45 days, ensuring fairness and transparency. Respondents 1 and 2 were tasked with ensuring compliance with the court's directives. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 May 2024 11:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293016 The HC determined BIAL is a "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution, subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The court found BIAL's tender process arbitrary, lacking transparency, and influenced by favoritism. Consequently, the court quashed the shortlisting and contract award, directing BIAL to restart the tender process within 45 days, ensuring fairness and transparency. Respondents 1 and 2 were tasked with ensuring compliance with the court's directives. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293016