<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 662 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403070</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application for extension of interim bail under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for a Director in the Amrapali Group of Companies, implicated in financial irregularities and a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The court emphasized the doctrine of merger, stating the interim order merges with the final order. As the rejection order of the previous bail application was not provided, the court concluded the applicant could file a second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. or challenge the rejection order. The court found the present application misconceived and directed the trial court to proceed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 662 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403070</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application for extension of interim bail under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for a Director in the Amrapali Group of Companies, implicated in financial irregularities and a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The court emphasized the doctrine of merger, stating the interim order merges with the final order. As the rejection order of the previous bail application was not provided, the court concluded the applicant could file a second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. or challenge the rejection order. The court found the present application misconceived and directed the trial court to proceed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>