<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 662 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403070</link>
    <description>An application under Section 482 CrPC seeking extension of interim bail was held not maintainable after the bail plea had been finally rejected on merits. Applying the doctrine of merger, the interim bail order was treated as absorbed into the final order, so it no longer survived as an independent relief capable of extension. The proper course was to file a fresh bail application under Section 439 CrPC or challenge the rejection order, rather than invoke inherent jurisdiction to prolong the earlier interim protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 662 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403070</link>
      <description>An application under Section 482 CrPC seeking extension of interim bail was held not maintainable after the bail plea had been finally rejected on merits. Applying the doctrine of merger, the interim bail order was treated as absorbed into the final order, so it no longer survived as an independent relief capable of extension. The proper course was to file a fresh bail application under Section 439 CrPC or challenge the rejection order, rather than invoke inherent jurisdiction to prolong the earlier interim protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>