<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 653 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403061</link>
    <description>A company struck off for non-filing of statutory returns was restored to the register under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 because the material showed continuing business activity, assets, and incorporation records consistent with an operating concern. The omission was treated as a filing default rather than cessation of business, and the statutory test for restoration was satisfied on the facts. Restoration was therefore directed, with consequential steps to revive the company&#039;s status and facilitate compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 653 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403061</link>
      <description>A company struck off for non-filing of statutory returns was restored to the register under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 because the material showed continuing business activity, assets, and incorporation records consistent with an operating concern. The omission was treated as a filing default rather than cessation of business, and the statutory test for restoration was satisfied on the facts. Restoration was therefore directed, with consequential steps to revive the company&#039;s status and facilitate compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>