<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 649 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403057</link>
    <description>The court declined to extend the deadlines for filing Tax Audit Reports and Income Tax Returns, noting the CBDT&#039;s previous extensions and the financial implications. It found that delays in releasing filing utilities did not warrant further extensions. Despite acknowledging the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the court emphasized the government&#039;s proactive measures and rejected the need for additional extensions. International comparisons were deemed insufficient grounds for extensions, and the court concluded that issuing a writ of mandamus was unwarranted, as the CBDT had acted reasonably. The court dismissed the petitions, suggesting a lenient approach to late filings under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 649 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403057</link>
      <description>The court declined to extend the deadlines for filing Tax Audit Reports and Income Tax Returns, noting the CBDT&#039;s previous extensions and the financial implications. It found that delays in releasing filing utilities did not warrant further extensions. Despite acknowledging the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the court emphasized the government&#039;s proactive measures and rejected the need for additional extensions. International comparisons were deemed insufficient grounds for extensions, and the court concluded that issuing a writ of mandamus was unwarranted, as the CBDT had acted reasonably. The court dismissed the petitions, suggesting a lenient approach to late filings under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>