<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24333</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the validity of the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed erroneous as the Commissioner had the necessary jurisdiction to intervene due to the prejudicial nature of the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s order canceling the Income-tax Officer&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:02:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24333</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the validity of the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed erroneous as the Commissioner had the necessary jurisdiction to intervene due to the prejudicial nature of the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s order canceling the Income-tax Officer&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>