https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292999 The Privy Council allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's decision and reinstating the Additional Subordinate Judge's judgment. It was held that the compromise agreement was not entered into with the appellant's knowledge and consent, and her representatives lacked the authority to consent on her behalf. The appellant's actions post-judgment did not estop her from challenging the decree. The court emphasized the need for strong evidence of a pardanashin woman's understanding and consent in transactions, highlighting the failure to provide such evidence in this case. The respondents were directed to bear the appellant's costs for the appeal proceedings. en-us Fri, 01 Dec 1922 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:32:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292999 The Privy Council allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's decision and reinstating the Additional Subordinate Judge's judgment. It was held that the compromise agreement was not entered into with the appellant's knowledge and consent, and her representatives lacked the authority to consent on her behalf. The appellant's actions post-judgment did not estop her from challenging the decree. The court emphasized the need for strong evidence of a pardanashin woman's understanding and consent in transactions, highlighting the failure to provide such evidence in this case. The respondents were directed to bear the appellant's costs for the appeal proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Dec 1922 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292999