<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1923 (6) TMI 4 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292994</link>
    <description>The Privy Council allowed the appeals, holding that tenants were not entitled to refunds based on its judgment. The judgments in both sets of cases were affirmed without costs, emphasizing the importance of the validity of decrees until reversed or superseded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1923 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:16:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1923 (6) TMI 4 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292994</link>
      <description>The Privy Council allowed the appeals, holding that tenants were not entitled to refunds based on its judgment. The judgments in both sets of cases were affirmed without costs, emphasizing the importance of the validity of decrees until reversed or superseded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1923 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>