https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292994 Money paid under a decree cannot be recovered in a fresh suit while that decree remains subsisting and valid; restitution arises only if the decree has been reversed or superseded. The earlier Privy Council decision did not overturn the decrees executed against the tenants, but only held that the High Court lacked power to set aside the subordinate courts' decisions in the circumstances then before it, so the tenants' refund claims failed. As to the landlord's later rent suits for subsequent faslis, the decrees fixing rent at an appropriate rate were affirmed because no challenge was pressed to the quantum and no further inquiry was required. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 1923 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:16:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292994 Money paid under a decree cannot be recovered in a fresh suit while that decree remains subsisting and valid; restitution arises only if the decree has been reversed or superseded. The earlier Privy Council decision did not overturn the decrees executed against the tenants, but only held that the High Court lacked power to set aside the subordinate courts' decisions in the circumstances then before it, so the tenants' refund claims failed. As to the landlord's later rent suits for subsequent faslis, the decrees fixing rent at an appropriate rate were affirmed because no challenge was pressed to the quantum and no further inquiry was required. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jun 1923 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292994