<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1877 (7) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292995</link>
    <description>The majority opinion in the case favored the plaintiff&#039;s right to recover enhanced rent paid under decrees based on a now-reversed order, citing the principle from Shama Purshad Roy Chowdry. The dissenting opinion cautioned against extending this principle, emphasizing adherence to established legal rules. The case was remanded to the Division Bench for final disposal, with a suggestion for a potential appeal to the Privy Council for a definitive resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 1877 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:16:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1877 (7) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292995</link>
      <description>The majority opinion in the case favored the plaintiff&#039;s right to recover enhanced rent paid under decrees based on a now-reversed order, citing the principle from Shama Purshad Roy Chowdry. The dissenting opinion cautioned against extending this principle, emphasizing adherence to established legal rules. The case was remanded to the Division Bench for final disposal, with a suggestion for a potential appeal to the Privy Council for a definitive resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 1877 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>