<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1937 (2) TMI 12 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292993</link>
    <description>Mesne profits received more than three years before suit were treated as time-barred because limitation for profits of immovable property runs from receipt and is not suspended absent express statutory provision. Money paid under a decree could not be recovered unless that decree had been reversed or superseded; the later Privy Council order did not supersede the separate revenue decrees, so recovery failed. The later Privy Council decision was read as conclusively establishing the validity of the wakf in its entirety, overriding the earlier narrower view. A revenue court&#039;s title finding made without jurisdiction could not bind later civil proceedings, because an beyond jurisdiction is a nullity and cannot operate as res judicata or estoppel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1937 (2) TMI 12 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292993</link>
      <description>Mesne profits received more than three years before suit were treated as time-barred because limitation for profits of immovable property runs from receipt and is not suspended absent express statutory provision. Money paid under a decree could not be recovered unless that decree had been reversed or superseded; the later Privy Council order did not supersede the separate revenue decrees, so recovery failed. The later Privy Council decision was read as conclusively establishing the validity of the wakf in its entirety, overriding the earlier narrower view. A revenue court&#039;s title finding made without jurisdiction could not bind later civil proceedings, because an beyond jurisdiction is a nullity and cannot operate as res judicata or estoppel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>