<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1937 (8) TMI 16 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292992</link>
    <description>A writ of mandamus seeking a reference under section 66 was not maintainable where it was directed against the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 33 rather than the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s assessment order. Under the amended scheme, a reference from the Commissioner&#039;s order lay only if that order enhanced the assessment or was otherwise prejudicial to the assessee, and a mere maintenance of the assessment did not meet that test. The assessee&#039;s own pleadings and the timing of the reference application confirmed that the challenge was to the Commissioner&#039;s order. The argument based on the earlier unamended law also failed because the amended provision governed pending matters and no valid reference from the assessment order had been made in time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:26:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1937 (8) TMI 16 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292992</link>
      <description>A writ of mandamus seeking a reference under section 66 was not maintainable where it was directed against the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 33 rather than the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s assessment order. Under the amended scheme, a reference from the Commissioner&#039;s order lay only if that order enhanced the assessment or was otherwise prejudicial to the assessee, and a mere maintenance of the assessment did not meet that test. The assessee&#039;s own pleadings and the timing of the reference application confirmed that the challenge was to the Commissioner&#039;s order. The argument based on the earlier unamended law also failed because the amended provision governed pending matters and no valid reference from the assessment order had been made in time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>