https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403038 Prompt supply of an order confirming attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act is necessary so the statutory appellate remedy is not made illusory; where the order is pronounced in open court, the relevant procedure contemplates timely delivery to parties, and delayed service is inconsistent with that safeguard. The article also notes that taking physical possession of attached immovable property before the appeal period expires may frustrate the right to challenge the attachment, so possession should not be enforced in a manner that defeats appellate access. The discussion emphasises preservation of an effective appeal and limited protective restraint on dispossession. en-us Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:12:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403038 Prompt supply of an order confirming attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act is necessary so the statutory appellate remedy is not made illusory; where the order is pronounced in open court, the relevant procedure contemplates timely delivery to parties, and delayed service is inconsistent with that safeguard. The article also notes that taking physical possession of attached immovable property before the appeal period expires may frustrate the right to challenge the attachment, so possession should not be enforced in a manner that defeats appellate access. The discussion emphasises preservation of an effective appeal and limited protective restraint on dispossession. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403038