https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403033 The appeal was dismissed, confirming the trial court's judgment of acquittal. The accused rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by proving material alterations in the cheque and absence of accused No. 1's signature. The complainant failed to establish a legally recoverable debt, with the court finding the cheque void under Section 87 of the Act due to alterations and lack of endorsements. The dismissal of the case against accused No. 2, coupled with unreliable evidence, led to the confirmation of the acquittal. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:12:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403033 The appeal was dismissed, confirming the trial court's judgment of acquittal. The accused rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by proving material alterations in the cheque and absence of accused No. 1's signature. The complainant failed to establish a legally recoverable debt, with the court finding the cheque void under Section 87 of the Act due to alterations and lack of endorsements. The dismissal of the case against accused No. 2, coupled with unreliable evidence, led to the confirmation of the acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403033