<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 624 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403032</link>
    <description>The court upheld the trial court&#039;s judgment of acquittal, finding that the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt, specifically regarding the amount owed by another individual. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:12:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 624 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403032</link>
      <description>The court upheld the trial court&#039;s judgment of acquittal, finding that the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt, specifically regarding the amount owed by another individual. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>