<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 623 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that LCD panels are correctly classified under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 9013 8010, not CTH 8529, based on the specific description provided in the tariff. Parts of LCD panels were also classified under CTH 9013 9010 following the main product&#039;s classification. The Tribunal emphasized that classification should align with the detailed tariff descriptions and judicial precedents, setting aside previous orders and granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 623 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that LCD panels are correctly classified under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 9013 8010, not CTH 8529, based on the specific description provided in the tariff. Parts of LCD panels were also classified under CTH 9013 9010 following the main product&#039;s classification. The Tribunal emphasized that classification should align with the detailed tariff descriptions and judicial precedents, setting aside previous orders and granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>