<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 50 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24327</link>
    <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner lacked legal authority to issue the penalty order post April 1, 1976. The ruling favored the Revenue over the assessee, with no cost orders issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:48:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 50 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24327</link>
      <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner lacked legal authority to issue the penalty order post April 1, 1976. The ruling favored the Revenue over the assessee, with no cost orders issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>