<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 615 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403023</link>
    <description>An inter-corporate deposit with agreed interest and treatment in the accounts as borrowing was characterised as financial debt because it involved disbursal against consideration for the time value of money. On that basis, a Section 7 insolvency application by a financial creditor did not require a Section 8 demand notice, which applies to operational debt. Limitation was also rejected because account extracts and admitted payments showed continuing acknowledgment and part-payment within the relevant period, and the pleaded default date brought the claim within time. The insolvency application therefore survived both objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:11:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 615 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403023</link>
      <description>An inter-corporate deposit with agreed interest and treatment in the accounts as borrowing was characterised as financial debt because it involved disbursal against consideration for the time value of money. On that basis, a Section 7 insolvency application by a financial creditor did not require a Section 8 demand notice, which applies to operational debt. Limitation was also rejected because account extracts and admitted payments showed continuing acknowledgment and part-payment within the relevant period, and the pleaded default date brought the claim within time. The insolvency application therefore survived both objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>