<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 608 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal at ITAT Hyderabad found that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was unwarranted in this case of inadvertent error by the auditor. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that inadvertent mistakes do not attract penal provisions. As a result, the penalty was deleted, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:11:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 608 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal at ITAT Hyderabad found that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was unwarranted in this case of inadvertent error by the auditor. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that inadvertent mistakes do not attract penal provisions. As a result, the penalty was deleted, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>