<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 598 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403006</link>
    <description>Marine pressure tight cables and marine non-pressure tight cables supplied for warships do not qualify as &quot;parts&quot; of warships under Entry 252 of Schedule I to Notification No. 01/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) unless they are shown to be integral and essential component parts of the vessel. The common parlance test was applied to the term &quot;parts&quot;, and the notification was read as granting the 5% rate only where the goods are necessary for the completeness of the ship itself. Mere intended use in warships, or support from an end use certificate, is insufficient. On the facts, the cables were not established as indispensable to the warship, so the concessional GST rate was unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 598 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403006</link>
      <description>Marine pressure tight cables and marine non-pressure tight cables supplied for warships do not qualify as &quot;parts&quot; of warships under Entry 252 of Schedule I to Notification No. 01/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) unless they are shown to be integral and essential component parts of the vessel. The common parlance test was applied to the term &quot;parts&quot;, and the notification was read as granting the 5% rate only where the goods are necessary for the completeness of the ship itself. Mere intended use in warships, or support from an end use certificate, is insufficient. On the facts, the cables were not established as indispensable to the warship, so the concessional GST rate was unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>