<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 49 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24323</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee, ruling against the Income-tax Officer&#039;s estimation of investment in the house and addition of a disputed deposit amount to the assessee&#039;s income. The court emphasized the need for proper assessment procedures and the requirement to seek explanations from relevant parties. Both issues were resolved in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:01:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 49 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24323</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee, ruling against the Income-tax Officer&#039;s estimation of investment in the house and addition of a disputed deposit amount to the assessee&#039;s income. The court emphasized the need for proper assessment procedures and the requirement to seek explanations from relevant parties. Both issues were resolved in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>