https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292975 The High Court of Madras addressed a case involving a provisional order of assessment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Despite the appeal limitation period not expiring, an eviction notice was issued prematurely. The court recognized the petitioner's intent to appeal and emphasized the statutory right of appeal under Section 26(3) should not be hindered. The court directed the petitioner to file the appeal within the limitation period and seek protective orders from the Appellate Tribunal by a specified date. Failure to do so would allow the respondent to proceed with eviction, with provisions for seeking court redress if faced with uncontrollable difficulties. en-us Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:03:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292975 The High Court of Madras addressed a case involving a provisional order of assessment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Despite the appeal limitation period not expiring, an eviction notice was issued prematurely. The court recognized the petitioner's intent to appeal and emphasized the statutory right of appeal under Section 26(3) should not be hindered. The court directed the petitioner to file the appeal within the limitation period and seek protective orders from the Appellate Tribunal by a specified date. Failure to do so would allow the respondent to proceed with eviction, with provisions for seeking court redress if faced with uncontrollable difficulties. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292975