<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1628 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the foreign companies involved in the case and therefore vacated the ex parte ad-interim orders. The decision on whether to delete the foreign entities from the Company Petition was deferred until the final hearing. Despite recognizing potential irreparable harm to both parties, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of respecting jurisdictional boundaries in its ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1628 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the foreign companies involved in the case and therefore vacated the ex parte ad-interim orders. The decision on whether to delete the foreign entities from the Company Petition was deferred until the final hearing. Despite recognizing potential irreparable harm to both parties, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of respecting jurisdictional boundaries in its ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>