<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1788 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292971</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside an ex-parte order by ld. CIT(A) due to lack of proper opportunity for the assessee to be heard in a penalty case under section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and ensuring parties have a fair opportunity to present their case in tax proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1788 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292971</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside an ex-parte order by ld. CIT(A) due to lack of proper opportunity for the assessee to be heard in a penalty case under section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and ensuring parties have a fair opportunity to present their case in tax proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>