<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1891 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292968</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that the payment made by the assessee to MMRDA was not considered as &quot;Rent&quot; under section 194I of the I.T. Act. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source and was not treated as an assessee in default under section 201 of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the earlier decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1891 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292968</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that the payment made by the assessee to MMRDA was not considered as &quot;Rent&quot; under section 194I of the I.T. Act. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source and was not treated as an assessee in default under section 201 of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the earlier decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>