https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292978 The Court allowed the petitioners to file a statutory appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act within the prescribed 45-day period. The Respondent Authority issued an eviction notice but agreed to delay implementation for 55 days to allow the petitioners to pursue their appeal without creating third-party interests in the properties. The Court directed the petitioners not to encumber the property during this period, with the implementation of the eviction notice dependent on the Appellate Authority's decisions. The case was disposed of with these instructions to uphold justice and legal process integrity. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jan 2021 22:03:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292978 The Court allowed the petitioners to file a statutory appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act within the prescribed 45-day period. The Respondent Authority issued an eviction notice but agreed to delay implementation for 55 days to allow the petitioners to pursue their appeal without creating third-party interests in the properties. The Court directed the petitioners not to encumber the property during this period, with the implementation of the eviction notice dependent on the Appellate Authority's decisions. The case was disposed of with these instructions to uphold justice and legal process integrity. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292978