<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 567 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292967</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Bombay High Court&#039;s orders due to lack of jurisdiction. The court emphasized the importance of proper jurisdiction in admiralty actions and the personal nature of limitation actions. All appeals were allowed without any order as to costs, considering the appellant&#039;s conduct and the overall circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 567 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292967</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Bombay High Court&#039;s orders due to lack of jurisdiction. The court emphasized the importance of proper jurisdiction in admiralty actions and the personal nature of limitation actions. All appeals were allowed without any order as to costs, considering the appellant&#039;s conduct and the overall circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>