https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292966 A tenancy by holding over arises only with mutual assent, and a tenant who continues to assert a larger contractual right cannot be treated as accepting a fresh month-to-month tenancy. Mere negotiations or an agreement to agree do not create a concluded lease, and continued possession after expiry is not part performance unless the alleged arrangement is proved with certainty on essential terms. Where no consensual renewal exists, possession ends by efflux of time; supervening expiry of the claimed lease may also be taken into account to finally support possession relief. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jan 2021 17:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292966 A tenancy by holding over arises only with mutual assent, and a tenant who continues to assert a larger contractual right cannot be treated as accepting a fresh month-to-month tenancy. Mere negotiations or an agreement to agree do not create a concluded lease, and continued possession after expiry is not part performance unless the alleged arrangement is proved with certainty on essential terms. Where no consensual renewal exists, possession ends by efflux of time; supervening expiry of the claimed lease may also be taken into account to finally support possession relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292966