<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (10) TMI 43 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH (INDORE BENCH)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292964</link>
    <description>Composite works contracts can contain a taxable sale element where goods are supplied for price and title passes, even if the materials are affixed to immovable property before completion; the State therefore had competence under Entry 54 to tax that materials component. The sales element was treated as occurring in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, but the validating legislation was held effective to cure the constitutional defect for the relevant period, so the inter-State objection failed. Rule 8 was invalid because its fixed-percentage deduction method used an artificial proxy rather than the actual price of goods sold, and it risked taxing labour or services; it was struck down as ultra vires.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 16:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (10) TMI 43 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH (INDORE BENCH)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292964</link>
      <description>Composite works contracts can contain a taxable sale element where goods are supplied for price and title passes, even if the materials are affixed to immovable property before completion; the State therefore had competence under Entry 54 to tax that materials component. The sales element was treated as occurring in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, but the validating legislation was held effective to cure the constitutional defect for the relevant period, so the inter-State objection failed. Rule 8 was invalid because its fixed-percentage deduction method used an artificial proxy rather than the actual price of goods sold, and it risked taxing labour or services; it was struck down as ultra vires.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>