<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 558 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402966</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the taxation of Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) benefits in India under Section 17(2)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for an employee deputed to Dubai. The ESOP benefits accrued in India when the options were granted, despite being taxed upon exercise. Relief under the India-UAE Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement was denied as the services were rendered in India, not UAE. The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, affirming the taxability of ESOP benefits in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 11:02:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 558 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402966</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the taxation of Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) benefits in India under Section 17(2)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for an employee deputed to Dubai. The ESOP benefits accrued in India when the options were granted, despite being taxed upon exercise. Relief under the India-UAE Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement was denied as the services were rendered in India, not UAE. The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, affirming the taxability of ESOP benefits in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>