<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PCIT&#039;s Section 263 Action Flawed: Failed to Prove AO&#039;s Order Prejudiced Revenue Despite Finding Error. Legal Precedent Cited.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56341</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - PCIT has come to conclusion that the order passed by AO is erroneous, but has not verified nor investigated to determine the other condition i.e. how it is prejudicial to the interest of revenue. As held in numerous case law and it is settle position of law that to initiate proceedings under section 263, twin conditions has to be satisfied. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 11:01:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 11:01:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PCIT&#039;s Section 263 Action Flawed: Failed to Prove AO&#039;s Order Prejudiced Revenue Despite Finding Error. Legal Precedent Cited.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56341</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - PCIT has come to conclusion that the order passed by AO is erroneous, but has not verified nor investigated to determine the other condition i.e. how it is prejudicial to the interest of revenue. As held in numerous case law and it is settle position of law that to initiate proceedings under section 263, twin conditions has to be satisfied. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 11:01:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>