<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1899 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292959</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment due to valid reasons to believe income had escaped taxation. However, it directed the assessing officer to adopt a fair market value of Rs. 900 per sq. meter for the land, as determined by the CIT(A) in an earlier order, rather than the initially assessed Rs. 2,000 per sq. meter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:04:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1899 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292959</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment due to valid reasons to believe income had escaped taxation. However, it directed the assessing officer to adopt a fair market value of Rs. 900 per sq. meter for the land, as determined by the CIT(A) in an earlier order, rather than the initially assessed Rs. 2,000 per sq. meter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>