https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292958 The High Court held that the revision petition was maintainable before it under Section 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, rejecting the State's objection. The impugned order passed by the magistrate on the application under Section 239 of the Cr.P.C was found to be irrational and against the statutory mandate, leading to the petitioners' discharge from the case involving charges under Sections 498-A and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. en-us Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:46:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292958 The High Court held that the revision petition was maintainable before it under Section 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, rejecting the State's objection. The impugned order passed by the magistrate on the application under Section 239 of the Cr.P.C was found to be irrational and against the statutory mandate, leading to the petitioners' discharge from the case involving charges under Sections 498-A and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292958