https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292958 Concurrent revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 CrPC permits a direct approach to the High Court even where Sessions Court revision is also available, though the statutory scheme bars a second revision by the same person after one revision is filed. In a warrant case, Section 239 requires the Magistrate to examine the police report and accompanying materials to decide whether the charge is groundless; discharge cannot be refused merely because allegations exist or the matter appears serious. On the stated facts, the allegations were omnibus and lacked specific overt acts, so the materials did not disclose sufficient participation in the alleged cruelty or intimidation and discharge was warranted. en-us Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:46:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292958 Concurrent revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 CrPC permits a direct approach to the High Court even where Sessions Court revision is also available, though the statutory scheme bars a second revision by the same person after one revision is filed. In a warrant case, Section 239 requires the Magistrate to examine the police report and accompanying materials to decide whether the charge is groundless; discharge cannot be refused merely because allegations exist or the matter appears serious. On the stated facts, the allegations were omnibus and lacked specific overt acts, so the materials did not disclose sufficient participation in the alleged cruelty or intimidation and discharge was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292958