https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292957 The court held that the Special Court designated under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) has the authority to conduct simultaneous trials for scheduled offences and offences under the PMLA. It concluded that the procedures for investigation and trial under the PMLA and scheduled offences being distinct does not prevent concurrent trials. The court emphasized that the Special Court must await the outcome of the scheduled offences trial before concluding the PMLA trial to prevent premature presumption of guilt. The court dismissed applications, allowing the Special Court to proceed with both trials concurrently. en-us Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292957 The court held that the Special Court designated under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) has the authority to conduct simultaneous trials for scheduled offences and offences under the PMLA. It concluded that the procedures for investigation and trial under the PMLA and scheduled offences being distinct does not prevent concurrent trials. The court emphasized that the Special Court must await the outcome of the scheduled offences trial before concluding the PMLA trial to prevent premature presumption of guilt. The court dismissed applications, allowing the Special Court to proceed with both trials concurrently. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292957