<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 98 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24311</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the Income-tax Officer lacked sufficient grounds to believe that income had escaped assessment. The court found that the petitioners had fully disclosed all material facts required for assessment, and differences in valuation reports did not justify reassessment. The petitions were allowed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:37:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 98 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24311</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the Income-tax Officer lacked sufficient grounds to believe that income had escaped assessment. The court found that the petitioners had fully disclosed all material facts required for assessment, and differences in valuation reports did not justify reassessment. The petitions were allowed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>