https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402930 The court allowed the writ petitions challenging the disqualification of directors by the Registrar of Companies (RoC) under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. It held that the RoC lacked the authority to deactivate Director Identification Numbers (DIN) based on disqualification, ordering the reactivation of DINs within 30 days. The judgment emphasized that the RoC could still investigate and take action for specific defaults but did not award costs in this instance. en-us Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:06:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402930 The court allowed the writ petitions challenging the disqualification of directors by the Registrar of Companies (RoC) under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. It held that the RoC lacked the authority to deactivate Director Identification Numbers (DIN) based on disqualification, ordering the reactivation of DINs within 30 days. The judgment emphasized that the RoC could still investigate and take action for specific defaults but did not award costs in this instance. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402930