<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 511 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402919</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the reference made by the three-member Bench, deeming it incompetent and emphasized adherence to the five-member Bench&#039;s judgment in &quot;V. Padmakumar&quot; as binding precedent. Judicial discipline and consistency in legal decisions were underscored, with the matter directed for regular hearing before the appropriate court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 511 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402919</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the reference made by the three-member Bench, deeming it incompetent and emphasized adherence to the five-member Bench&#039;s judgment in &quot;V. Padmakumar&quot; as binding precedent. Judicial discipline and consistency in legal decisions were underscored, with the matter directed for regular hearing before the appropriate court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>