https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292944 The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of nomination papers for the Cantonment Board election. It upheld the rejection of the first petitioner due to lack of proof of tax payment, the second petitioner for being listed in multiple electoral rolls, and the third petitioner for insufficient evidence of Scheduled Caste status. The court emphasized the need to pursue remedies through election petitions rather than via writ petitions, citing jurisdictional limitations during the election process. It directed prompt resolution of election disputes through appropriate channels and rejected additional petitions and applications. en-us Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:29:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292944 The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of nomination papers for the Cantonment Board election. It upheld the rejection of the first petitioner due to lack of proof of tax payment, the second petitioner for being listed in multiple electoral rolls, and the third petitioner for insufficient evidence of Scheduled Caste status. The court emphasized the need to pursue remedies through election petitions rather than via writ petitions, citing jurisdictional limitations during the election process. It directed prompt resolution of election disputes through appropriate channels and rejected additional petitions and applications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292944