https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292944 A statutory election framework was treated as an exclusive code for challenges to rejection of nomination papers, so writ intervention after the election process had begun was held impermissible except for clear jurisdictional or constitutional infirmity; disputed factual objections were left to the election petition remedy. Nomination rejection was also upheld where candidates failed to displace objections at scrutiny regarding professional tax arrears, residence, and multiple electoral rolls, and the Returning Officer was not required to conduct a roving enquiry. For the reserved-seat candidate, rejection for want of satisfactory proof of Scheduled Caste status was sustained because eligibility had not been established at the relevant stage. en-us Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:29:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292944 A statutory election framework was treated as an exclusive code for challenges to rejection of nomination papers, so writ intervention after the election process had begun was held impermissible except for clear jurisdictional or constitutional infirmity; disputed factual objections were left to the election petition remedy. Nomination rejection was also upheld where candidates failed to displace objections at scrutiny regarding professional tax arrears, residence, and multiple electoral rolls, and the Returning Officer was not required to conduct a roving enquiry. For the reserved-seat candidate, rejection for want of satisfactory proof of Scheduled Caste status was sustained because eligibility had not been established at the relevant stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292944