<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1709 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the land sold by the appellant, which was located outside a Municipality and 2.5 KM away from its limits, did not qualify as a &quot;capital asset&quot; under section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the appellant was not liable to pay capital gains tax on the sale transaction. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO for long term capital gains, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=633007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1709 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the land sold by the appellant, which was located outside a Municipality and 2.5 KM away from its limits, did not qualify as a &quot;capital asset&quot; under section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the appellant was not liable to pay capital gains tax on the sale transaction. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO for long term capital gains, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>