https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292939 The court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, sentencing them to four months of simple imprisonment and a fine. The court found that the procedural rules for collecting and analyzing blood samples were substantially complied with, and minor deviations did not invalidate the Chemical Analyzer's report. The court dismissed the Criminal Revision Application, directing the accused to serve the sentence and vacating the stay granted. en-us Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:25:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292939 The court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, sentencing them to four months of simple imprisonment and a fine. The court found that the procedural rules for collecting and analyzing blood samples were substantially complied with, and minor deviations did not invalidate the Chemical Analyzer's report. The court dismissed the Criminal Revision Application, directing the accused to serve the sentence and vacating the stay granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292939