<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1208 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292938</link>
    <description>The appeal was against the deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for denial of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. The High Court upheld the deletion of penalty amounting to Rs. 12,03,242 by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) as the issue of denial of deduction was considered debatable. The Tribunal&#039;s initial allowance of the deduction, later confirmed by the High Court, indicated the debatable nature of the claim, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal and confirmation of penalty deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1208 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292938</link>
      <description>The appeal was against the deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for denial of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. The High Court upheld the deletion of penalty amounting to Rs. 12,03,242 by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) as the issue of denial of deduction was considered debatable. The Tribunal&#039;s initial allowance of the deduction, later confirmed by the High Court, indicated the debatable nature of the claim, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal and confirmation of penalty deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>