<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 473 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 and confirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the exemption claimed under Section 54F. The issue of interest under Section 234B was rendered academic due to the decision on the jurisdictional issue. The judgment emphasized that a mere change of opinion does not justify reopening an assessment and upheld the importance of full and true disclosure of primary facts by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 473 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 and confirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the exemption claimed under Section 54F. The issue of interest under Section 234B was rendered academic due to the decision on the jurisdictional issue. The judgment emphasized that a mere change of opinion does not justify reopening an assessment and upheld the importance of full and true disclosure of primary facts by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>