<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 461 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2017-18, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and procedural deficiencies in the AO&#039;s actions, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 461 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2017-18, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and procedural deficiencies in the AO&#039;s actions, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>