<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 429 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402837</link>
    <description>Paneer sold loose in plastic carry bags may qualify for GST exemption only if it is not put up in a unit container and does not bear a registered brand name or any other actionable brand name. The ruling reads the exemption and tariff notifications together and treats a unit container as a package designed to hold a predetermined quantity, with the quantity indicated on the package. On the stated facts, unsealed loose paneer without a predetermined quantity was regarded as not in a unit container, while display of the manufacturer&#039;s name and registered address under food safety law was treated as branding for notification purposes. The exemption was therefore considered available only if both conditions were absent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 429 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402837</link>
      <description>Paneer sold loose in plastic carry bags may qualify for GST exemption only if it is not put up in a unit container and does not bear a registered brand name or any other actionable brand name. The ruling reads the exemption and tariff notifications together and treats a unit container as a package designed to hold a predetermined quantity, with the quantity indicated on the package. On the stated facts, unsealed loose paneer without a predetermined quantity was regarded as not in a unit container, while display of the manufacturer&#039;s name and registered address under food safety law was treated as branding for notification purposes. The exemption was therefore considered available only if both conditions were absent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>