<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 424 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402832</link>
    <description>The ruling classified &quot;Franchisee Fees&quot; and &quot;Royalty&quot; under Heading 9983, attracting GST at 18%. The transfer of an operational outlet was deemed a sale of business assets, not a transfer of a going concern. Consequently, the transaction did not qualify for tax exemption under Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). However, the applicant was eligible for Input Tax Credit under Section 16(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, and related rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 424 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402832</link>
      <description>The ruling classified &quot;Franchisee Fees&quot; and &quot;Royalty&quot; under Heading 9983, attracting GST at 18%. The transfer of an operational outlet was deemed a sale of business assets, not a transfer of a going concern. Consequently, the transaction did not qualify for tax exemption under Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). However, the applicant was eligible for Input Tax Credit under Section 16(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, and related rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>