https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292928 Leave to sue a receiver should generally not be refused where the applicant shows a prima facie legal basis for the claim and a threatened injury to the alleged property interest. The text treats such a situation as one requiring factual inquiry and quia timet protection, rather than postponing relief until after irreversible prejudice occurs. It also states that a refusal made without adequate inquiry into disputed facts may amount to material irregularity, making the order amenable to supervisory correction under revisional and constitutional powers. The application is therefore described as succeeding on the footing that the applicants were permitted to proceed against the receiver. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 1918 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:43:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292928 Leave to sue a receiver should generally not be refused where the applicant shows a prima facie legal basis for the claim and a threatened injury to the alleged property interest. The text treats such a situation as one requiring factual inquiry and quia timet protection, rather than postponing relief until after irreversible prejudice occurs. It also states that a refusal made without adequate inquiry into disputed facts may amount to material irregularity, making the order amenable to supervisory correction under revisional and constitutional powers. The application is therefore described as succeeding on the footing that the applicants were permitted to proceed against the receiver. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Jul 1918 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292928