<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 416 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402824</link>
    <description>The National Anti-Profiteering Authority found the Respondent guilty of violating Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 by not passing on the benefit of input tax credit to buyers, resulting in increased prices and GST payments. However, the Authority withdrew the penalty proceedings under Section 171(3A) as the penal provisions could not be applied retrospectively to the period of violation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 416 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402824</link>
      <description>The National Anti-Profiteering Authority found the Respondent guilty of violating Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 by not passing on the benefit of input tax credit to buyers, resulting in increased prices and GST payments. However, the Authority withdrew the penalty proceedings under Section 171(3A) as the penal provisions could not be applied retrospectively to the period of violation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>