https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24287 Carry forward of losses was refused because the return under section 139(1) was filed beyond time, and the court held that the assessee should pursue the statutory appellate remedy rather than invoke writ jurisdiction. It found no violation of natural justice and no lack of jurisdiction in the impugned order, so writ relief was not warranted on those grounds. The court also noted that a rectification application under section 154 was pending and expected the revenue authority to dispose of it expeditiously in accordance with law. The petition was dismissed without expressing any view on the merits of the cited precedents. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:38:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24287 Carry forward of losses was refused because the return under section 139(1) was filed beyond time, and the court held that the assessee should pursue the statutory appellate remedy rather than invoke writ jurisdiction. It found no violation of natural justice and no lack of jurisdiction in the impugned order, so writ relief was not warranted on those grounds. The court also noted that a rectification application under section 154 was pending and expected the revenue authority to dispose of it expeditiously in accordance with law. The petition was dismissed without expressing any view on the merits of the cited precedents. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 02 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24287