https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402792 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant as their services to foreign clients did not fall under "Video Tape Production Service" as per Section 65(105)(zi) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant's activities did not involve recording programs, events, or functions, but rather post-production film activities for foreign clients. Consequently, the demand for Service Tax of &8377;45,77,295/- for the period from 01.04.2010 to 31.03.2011 was set aside, providing the appellant with consequential benefits. en-us Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:38:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402792 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant as their services to foreign clients did not fall under "Video Tape Production Service" as per Section 65(105)(zi) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant's activities did not involve recording programs, events, or functions, but rather post-production film activities for foreign clients. Consequently, the demand for Service Tax of &8377;45,77,295/- for the period from 01.04.2010 to 31.03.2011 was set aside, providing the appellant with consequential benefits. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402792