<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1413 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292924</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition and granting the deduction under Section 35(1)(ii). The Tribunal emphasized that the deduction should not be denied due to the retrospective withdrawal of approval by the CBDT, citing relevant provisions and precedents in support of the assessee&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1413 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292924</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition and granting the deduction under Section 35(1)(ii). The Tribunal emphasized that the deduction should not be denied due to the retrospective withdrawal of approval by the CBDT, citing relevant provisions and precedents in support of the assessee&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>